Organisations are beginning to lose patience with IT and property directors

By John Blackwell

Edition 5 – May 2015 Pages 18-21

Tags: workplace strategy • technology

Productivity is at the heart of all businesses and is essential for corporate growth.When it comes to increasing output at an organisation,which in turn then directly relates to wider real wage growth and higher living standards in the economy,then the only determinant is productivity,measured in terms of output per hour worked.
The basic facts on productivity are clear.For over a decade, productivity has been painfully weak across all the major economies – UK,US,EU,Japan,G7. The UK is just one of the world’s major economies that has performed particularly badly,with actual productivity having declined by 3.7% since 2008 alone. A recent OECD report went as far as saying,“… Weak labour productivity since 2004 has been holding back real wages and well-being. The sustainability of economic expansion and further progress in living standards rest on boosting productivity growth,which is a key challenge for the coming years…”¹

Yet all of this is in the face of a decade-long onslaught of new ‘productivity’ interventions from a range of directions. So,all of this begs the rather obvious question, of what’s really happening to all these fantastic productivity initiatives? Recent research has highlighted that business leaders have lost patience with this situation and are taking direct action.

This article explores the background to this unsustainable situation,what actions organisations are currently taking,and what outcomes can be anticipated?

An age of speed

Our age of speed and overload has been building for generations. Inventions such as the telegraph,cinema, railroad,and airplane have progressively reduced distance and upended our traditional temporal rhythms.

However,the first high-tech revolutions that began to shift our experiences of time and space more than a century ago have substantially intensified over the course of the last ten years.

Unlike any time in past hundred years, the last decade has seen a veritable avalanche of new ‘things’ that have accelerated our hypermobile, split-focus, cyber-centric culture.

The result of this excess of interventions is to have left the workforce continually distracted by new facilities, tools, and policies to collaborate, communicate, and connect but all too frequently without the required forethought to ensure these interventions work in unison and with context.

For example, our colleagues in the elds of architecture and design have relentlessly bombarded our workforces with a decade-long campaign of open plan officing,hotelling,hot desking, collaboration space, ‘communicate-collaborate- concentrate-contemplate’ spaces, ‘activity based working’, ‘spatial adjacency’ and a number of other new ideas and variations on themes.Someone even thought it was a good idea to incorporate ski gondolas in an office design.

Our IT colleagues have
driven us from desktops to virtualisation, laptops to tablets. We have gone from cellular to smartphones, from internet to ‘i’ everything, from GUI to cloud, USB to uni ed communications, with each iteration promising great productive gains. We have gone from megabyte to petabyte all because big data is good data.

And our Human Resources colleagues have taken their workforces on a journey from personnel administration
to emotional capital, from job satisfaction to employee engagement, from employment to empowerment, from training to ‘integrated capability development’, from hiring to talent analytics, from career to core competencies. We have experienced a decade of telecommuting to exible working to agile working.

Without exception, all of these interventions have entered into our workplaces with the promise of untold productivity gains. Yet, the absence of clear ‘what’s in it for me’ messaging, and frequent lack of cohesion between the various delivery functions have only succeeded in confusing and distracting the workforce.

Interrupting science

While there’s always a number of excuses put forward to explain this dwindling productivity, everything points to one overriding factor that stands out head-and-shoulders above all others, namely ‘interruption science’.

We prize knowledge work – work that relies on our intellectual abilities – and yet the evidence is that we increasingly have no time to think.

The greatest casualty of our mobile, high- tech,over-burdened age is attention – and by implication,productivity. By fragmenting
and di using our powers of attention,we are undermining our capacity to thrive in a complex, ever-shifting world.

Beeped and pinged, interrupted and inundated, overloaded and hurried – that is how we live today and the average knowledge worker is interrupted, switching tasks every three minutes. Once distracted, a worker takes nearly a half-hour to resume the original task.

Amongst the mounting costs² of this widespread distraction are;

• Knowledge work can’t be done in sound bites. Interruptions and the time to recover now consume 28% of a worker’s day,
• Employees who are routinely interrupted and lack time to focus feel 40% more frustrated, pressured, and stressed,

The bottom line is that business functions – those responsible for productive business outcomes – are no longer willing to be ‘gifted’ with the latest, greatest IT, or tolerate being shoehorned into inappropriate space in inappropriate locations that stifle their ability to attract, recruit, and retain the right talent. This has reached the point where recent research from the Corporate Executive Board, and corroborated by our own independent research³ is showing that three- quarters of corporate IT and Property spend in 2015 will be controlled directly by the business and not part of a separate IT or Property function budget.

Business support functions must be part of a more nimble model directly supporting business delivery units.

For example, we now have cloud services instead of corporate infrastructure, consequently we need support people focused on what and why rather than how and when. We need support function people to have collaborative and analytical skills,who understand the outcomes and can work in business driven, cross-functional teams. However, research4 nds that as high as 90% of existing business support function sta do not possess such skills!

Combine this skills mismatch with; changes in budget ownership, the sharp upswing in app-based infrastructure, and property costs seen as an overhead,which is accelerating the pressure to reduce costs and improve space utilisation, all the indicators are an 80-90% redundancy across IT and Property functions over the next 18 months.

As one FTSE100 CEO said to us, “…I can tell you roughly what our headcount is likely to be in twelve months’ time but don’t ask me
to predict what jobs they will be doing. If we can’t predict that, then it’s hopeless to try and suggest where office space will be required…”

With business units now controlling the majority of IT and Property budgets, the focus has shifted to an intense scrutiny of the previously heavily siloed business support functions and the roles performed by their respective IT and Property directors.

Prioritising talent retention

From 2009,there has been a perfect storm in university entrance statistics where,under increasing financial pressure, the world’s leading universities have entered an ‘arms race’

to be rated as the highest performers. Understandably, universities focus on selecting the very brightest entrants onto their graduate programmes – and at age 18-19,women are achieving 8-10 points higher academic achievement compared to their male contemporaries.

The net result is that women will comprise 67-69% of graduates for 2015-16,a percentage that is only set to grow in future years. This means that employers looking to secure the best and brightest talent must place a significantly greater focus on being better at attracting and retaining female graduates. However,this brightest cohort are entering workplaces where,as figure 3 shows,overall only 2-in- 5 staff regard the way their workspace is designed and laid out optimises their productivity – a sharp rebuke for outpourings of office architectural and design practices. Furthermore,newly hired staff report encountering dull and uninspiring management. Consequently,it is hardly surprising that 45-50% of the brightest,newly hired talent are leaving their organisations within the first two years⁵

Conclusion

It is clearly time for the important business support functions – IT and Property – to slim down, shape up, and merge into the business divisions while Business decision makers need to balance the need for longer-term investment and strategies. The traditional role of IT and Property Directors as head of sprawling silos, controlling vast budgets, operating separately from the business function has clearly had its day.

There is a compelling need to reinforce common goals, build relationships, and connect a deep understanding of the business model and desired outcomes with the technology that is already running the ‘ firm’ and the locations needed to retain the best talent.

We are witnessing a sea change in IT and Property Director priorities but a change is also needed throughout their operations. In many cases,executives still prioritise on the wrong competencies as talent planning is not linked to strategy and is unable to handle change.

However,this requires existing functional staff to cast off their former silo’d mantle and acquire a new set of skills, which few appear to possess. They lack the collaborative and analytical skills,and judgment needed to work in business driven,cross-functional teams. They require emotional intelligence from motivation,reflection,and self-awareness, fostering relationships,understanding organisational dynamics,together with being socially aware and business savvy.

These new capabilities underpin the new roles that will form the new business IT and business property delivery W&P

About the Authors

Reference

1. http://www.oecd.org/unitedkingdom/economic-survey-united- kingdom.htm

2. https://isr.uci.edu/users/gloria-mark

3. “Time to Change – researching the changing nature of work” Quora, 2015

4. “Time to Change – researching the changing nature of work” Quora, 2015

5. “Time to Change – researching the changing nature of work” Quora, 2015

 

Quote:

…Our workforce is continually distracted by new facilities, tools, and policies to collaborate, communicate, and connect but without the forethought to ensure these interventions work in unison and with context…

…The bottom line is that business functions are no longer willing to be ‘gifted’ with the latest, greatest iT, or tolerate being shoehorned into inappropriate space that stifles their ability to attract, recruit, and retain the right talent…

…There is a compelling need to reinforce common goals, build relationships, and connect a deep understanding of the business model and desired outcomes with technology and the locations needed to retain the best talent…

Graphic: